An Always-On Research Panel for Marketing Teams

Marketing produces opinions at scale: about headlines, about ads, about what the audience wants. The audience rarely gets a vote until launch day. FocusGroups AI puts a panel of your audience inside the workflow, so every headline, campaign concept, and brand argument can be tested in the time it takes to get coffee, and the work that ships has already survived contact with someone other than the team.

Start free or try the free persona generator.

The research gap you're working around

Creative debates with no referee

When there's no audience data, the highest-paid opinion wins. That's a process for producing consensus, not effective copy.

Research that can't keep up

The campaign ships Thursday. The research team's queue opens in three weeks. So the campaign ships untested, again.

Personas gathering dust

Most teams have persona decks nobody opens. They describe the audience but can't answer a single question about this week's brief.

What you can run, starting today

Test messages before they ship

Headlines, value props, email subject lines, campaign taglines: paste the variants, get a verdict with reasoning in minutes. Message testing.

Pre-test ads before the spend

Kill weak ad variants before they burn budget, and find the hook your audience actually quotes back. Ad testing.

Pressure-test campaign concepts

Run the big idea through a three-round panel discussion before production starts. Themes, objections, and a clear read. AI Focus Group.

Make personas that talk back

Replace the static persona deck with personas you can interview: ask them about this week's brief, not last year's segmentation. Persona Generator.

Settle the positioning argument

Two camps, two taglines? Run the A/B test, read the reasoning, and move on with the stronger one. AI A/B Test.

An illustrative example

A marketing team of four tested a quarter's campaign concept the week before creative production.

Focus group on the campaign theme with their two core segments, then A/B tests on the three strongest taglines.

The decision: They split the campaign into two segment-specific angles and shipped with the plain tagline.

Built for the way you work

Frequently Asked Questions

How is this different from just asking ChatGPT to review my copy?

A chatbot gives you one agreeable assistant's opinion. A panel gives you multiple distinct personas with their own goals and objections, a structured methodology (tally, themes, rounds of discussion), and a report built for decisions. The disagreement between personas is where the insight lives.

Can it test work that isn't text, like visuals?

It's strongest on anything language carries: copy, scripts, concepts, offers, and positioning. For visual creative, teams describe the concept and test the underlying angle, then judge execution separately.

How do we fit this into our existing workflow?

A simple pattern: add a 15-minute test gate before creative review, so variants go through a panel first and the review meeting starts from the verdict instead of from scratch. Reports export cleanly for sharing in Slack or decks.

Will it replace our brand tracker or live A/B testing?

No. It sits before them: pre-testing kills weak options and explains reactions, then your live tests and trackers measure real behavior with stronger candidates.

Keep exploring

Put a panel to work today

Start free and run your first study in minutes. Get started.